In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility data of global meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates causing pneumonia: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2014-2021, and re-estimations of susceptibility breakpoints and appropriate dosages of important antibiotics for pneumonia treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the susceptibility of globally pneumonia-causing meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates against important antibiotics and estimate appropriate dosages of indicated antibiotics. METHODS: We extracted the 2014-2021 Antimicrobial Testing of Leadership Surveillance database regarding the susceptibility of MEM-R A. baumannii isolates causing pneumonia against important antibiotics. The susceptibility and carbapenemase-encoding gene (CPEG) data of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of five major regions were analyzed. The susceptibility breakpoints (SBP) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022, other necessary criteria [SBP of MIC for colistin, 2 mg/L, in the CLSI 2018; and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL), 16 mg/L], and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of indicated antibiotics were employed. RESULTS: Applying the aforementioned criteria, we observed the susceptible rates of colistin, minocycline, and CFP-SUL against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates globally (n = 2905) were 93.2%, 69.1%, and 26.3%, respectively. Minocycline was significantly more active in vitro (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates collected from North and South America compared to those from other regions (>90% vs. 58-72%). Additionally, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 were the predominant CPEG in pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: After deliberative estimations, dosages of 200 mg minocycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 8 mg/L), 100 mg tigecycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 1 mg/L), and 160 mg nebulized colistin methanesulphonate every 8 h (SBP, 2 mg/L) are needed for the effective treatment of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungals against invasive isolates of Cryptococcus species worldwide: Global antifungal antimicrobial testing leadership and surveillance program, 2010-2020.

This study examined the geographic distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungals against Cryptococcus isolates. Data were collected on the MICs of specific antifungals (amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) against various Cryptococcus species for the period 2010 to 2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database. Cryptococcus isolates were collected from samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients hospitalized in different regions worldwide. We applied the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) of antifungals against various Cryptococcus species to distinguish wild-type (WT) from non-WT Cryptococcus isolates. A total of 395 isolates of Cryptococcus species cultured from blood (n = 201) or CSF (n = 194) were analyzed. C. grubii (n = 270), C. neoformans (n = 111), and C. gattii (n = 11) were the three predominant species causing bloodstream infections (BSI) or meningitis/meningoencephalitis (MME). The proportion of MICs above the ECV (1 mg/L) for amphotericin B among C. neoformans isolates was significantly lower than that among C. gattii isolates (MICs >0.5 mg/L; P < 0.001), as evaluated using the chi-square test. For most isolates of the three predominant Cryptococcus species, the MICs of new triazoles were ≤0.25 mg/L. The MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B in the BSI/MME-causing Cryptococcus isolates collected from patients hospitalized in the Asia-Western Pacific region and Europe were significantly lower (i.e., the distributions were more leftward) than those in North America and Latin America. Ongoing monitoring of MIC data for important antifungals against cryptococcosis is crucial.

Use of Multiple Doses of Intravenous Infusion of Umbilical Cord-Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Literature Review.

Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical complication in severe COVID-19 patients. The intravenous infusion (IVF) of umbilical cord- (UC-) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), validated to substantially reduce the release of several inflammatory cytokines in vivo, was also shown to exhibit benefits in improving hypoxemia among severe COVID-19 patients. A single dose of IVF-UC-MSCs therapy for severe COVID-19 patients was shown to alleviate the initial ARDS severity, but have 50%-67% case-fatality rates. In Taiwan, few adult patients with severe COVID-19-induced ARDS receiving compassionate adjuvant treatment consisting of either a single dose (1-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight (kg BW)) or three doses (5 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) of IVF-UC-MSCs had good outcomes. However, the optimal dosage and rounds of IVF-UC-MSCs administration for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS are undetermined. Methods: We reviewed the 2020-2022 PubMed literature database concerning the clinical efficacy of IVF-UC-MSCs among severe COVID-19 patients. Results: The data of COVID-19 case series in the PubMed literature revealed a notable heterogeneity in the therapeutic dosage (a single dose: 1-10 × 106 cells/kg BW; and three doses: 50-200 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) and the post-ARDS days of IVF-UC-MSCs administration (a single dose: 1-12; and multiple doses: 5-14) for the treatment of severe COVID-19-associated ARDS. The survival rates among these severe COVID-19 patients ranged from 50% to 76%. However, an overall rate of 93.1% of significant improvement in hypoxemia was observed for the COVID-19 survivors receiving IVF-UC-MSCs at the initial ARDS stage. Conclusions: According to our analysis, the ideal treatment dosage of IVF-UC-MSCs for severe COVID-19-induced ARDS is likely 5 × 106 cells/kg BW for three cycles within 5 days of ARDS onset in severe COVID-19 patients.

Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.

In Vitro Susceptibilities of Worldwide Isolates of Intrapulmonary Aspergillus Species and Important Candida Species in Sterile Body Sites against Important Antifungals: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2017-2020.

To understand the changes of resistance in clinically commonly encountered fungi, we used the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) database to explore in vitro antifungal susceptibilities against clinically important isolates of Aspergillus and Candida species (collected from intrapulmonary and sterile body areas, respectively). We applied the CLSI antifungal 2020 and the EUCAST antifungal 2020 guidelines. From 2017 to 2020, isolates of intrapulmonary Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 660), Aspergillus niger (n = 107), Aspergillus flavus (n = 96), Aspergillus terreus (n = 40), and Aspergillus nidulans species complex (n = 26) and sterile site-originated isolates of Candida albicans (n = 1,810), Candida glabrata (n = 894), Candida krusei (n = 120), Candida dubliniensis (n = 107), Candida lusitaniae (n = 82), Candida guilliermondii (n = 28), and Candida auris (n = 7) were enrolled in this study. Using the EUCAST 2020 breakpoints, it was demonstrated that amphotericin B and posaconazole displayed poor in vitro susceptibility rates against A. fumigatus isolates (<50% and 18.9%, respectively). In contrast, isavuconazole and itraconazole showed high in vitro potency against most Aspergillus isolates (>92%). Most intrapulmonary Aspergillus isolates exhibited MICs of ≤0.06 µg/mL to anidulafungin. Furthermore, intrapulmonary A. fumigatus isolates collected from Italy and the United Kingdom exhibited lower in vitro susceptibility to isavuconazole (72.2% and 69%, respectively) than those in the remaining ATLAS participant countries (>85%). Higher isavuconazole MIC90s against C. auris and C. guilliermondii (1 and 4 µg/mL, respectively) were observed compared to the other five Candida species. Despite the aforementioned MICs and susceptibilities against fungi, research needs to consider the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and clinical treatment experience with antifungals against specific Aspergillus species. IMPORTANCE In addition to monitoring the antifungal susceptibilities of clinically important fungi, reviewing the PK/PD indices and the clinical therapy experience of antifungals under evaluation are important to guide an appropriate antifungal prescription. The efficacies of liposomal amphotericin B complex and anidulafungin for the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis caused by different Aspergillus species need to be periodically evaluated in the future.

In vitro susceptibilities of isolates of potentially naturally inducible chromosomal AmpC-producing metallo-ß-lactamase-negative carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species to ceftazidime-avibactam: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Programme, 2012-2019.

OBJECTIVES: A total of 74 570 potentially naturally inducible chromosomal AmpC-producing (PNIC-AmpC) Enterobacterales isolates included in the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Programme were obtained worldwide during 2012-2019 (22 503 from 2012-2014 and 52 067 from 2015-2019). Of these isolates, 117 and 711 obtained during 2012-2014 and 2015-2019, respectively, were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (PNIC-AmpC-CRE). The MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam for these isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method. METHODS: Genes encoding different Ambler classes of ß-lactamases were investigated using multiplex PCR. After 97 isolates harbouring genes encoding metallo-ß-lactamases (MßL) were excluded, 731 PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates (101 from 2012-2014 and 630 from 2015-2019) were included in this study. RESULTS: Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) complex species, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Citrobacter freundii (C. freundii) complex species accounted for 36.3% (n = 265), 30.4% (n = 222) and 11.8% (n = 86), respectively, followed by Providencia species (n = 72), Serratia species (n = 52) and Klebsiella aerogenes (n = 34). The resistance rates to ceftazidime-avibactam for the overall PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates markedly differed between the two periods (35.6% vs. 63.3%; P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for the MßL-negative-CR-E. cloacae complex species (47.4% vs. 65.2%; P = 0.046) and MßL-negative-CR-E. coli (16.2% vs. 63.8%; P < 0.001) but not for MßL-negative-CR-C. freundii complex species (40% vs. 62%; P = 0.153). Amongst the PNIC-AmpC MßL-negative CRE isolates, resistance rates to ceftazidime-avibactam worsened. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be taken when empirically prescribing ceftazidime-avibactam for infections caused by PNIC-AmpC-CRE before susceptibility data are available.

Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (CRE; harboring mainly blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48-like genes), CR- or MDR/XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (production of VIM, IMP, or NDM carbapenemases combined with porin alteration), and Acinetobacter baumannii complex (producing mainly OXA-23, OXA-58-like carbapenemases), have gradually worsened and become a major challenge to public health because of limited antibiotic choice and high case-fatality rates. Diverse MDR/XDR-GNB isolates have been predominantly cultured from inpatients and hospital equipment/settings, but CRE has also been identified in community settings and long-term care facilities. Several CRE outbreaks cost hospitals and healthcare institutions huge economic burdens for disinfection and containment of their disseminations. Parenteral polymyxin B/E has been observed to have a poor pharmacokinetic profile for the treatment of CR- and XDR-GNB. It has been determined that tigecycline is suitable for the treatment of bloodstream infections owing to GNB, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a last-resort antibiotic against GNB of Ambler class A/C/D enzyme-producers and a majority of CR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, ceftolozane-tazobactam is shown to exhibit excellent in vitro activity against CR- and XDR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Several pharmaceuticals have devoted to exploring novel antibiotics to combat these troublesome XDR-GNBs. Nevertheless, only few antibiotics are shown to be effective in vitro against CR/XDR-A. baumannii complex isolates. In this era of antibiotic pipelines, strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship is as important as in-time isolation cohorts in limiting the spread of CR/XDR-GNB and alleviating the worsening trends of resistance.

Non-susceptibilities to antibiotics against important Gram-negative bacteria, and imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam against carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates implicated in complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in Taiwan, 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Susceptibility of isolates of top-ranking Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa implicated in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and urinary tract infections (cUTI) to important antibiotics, including imipenem-relebactam (IMR) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB), in Taiwan in 2019 were evaluated. METHODS: MICs to various antibiotics were determined using broth microdilution method. Susceptibility results were interpreted mainly based on the MIC breakpoints of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2021, but susceptibilities of IMR and MVB were interpreted based on the CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2021. Resistance genes amongst carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were investigated using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Escherichia coli (n = 356), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 165) and Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 42) isolates accounted for 85.3% of the 660 Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: The non-susceptibility rates of imipenem (IPM), IMR against isolates of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales, and meropenem (MEM), MVB against all Enterobacterales isolates were 92.2%/94.8%, 98.4-98.7%/98.4-99%, 95%/98.2% and 98.8-100%/99.4-100% for the cIAI/cUTI subgroups, respectively. Amongst the 40 IPM-NS-non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales isolates, when the CLSI 2021 criteria were applied, 10 were NS to IMR, and four Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (harbouring blaKPC but neither blaMBL nor blaOXA-48-like genes) were NS to IMR and MVB. Amongst the 93 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates under evaluation, the addition of relebactam (4 mg/L) resulted in a 4-to-16-fold reduction in the MICs of IPM in all 15 IPM-NS-Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (including 10 porin-deficient ones) not harbouring blaMBL/blaOXA-48-like genes. Contrastingly, the addition of vaborbactam (8 mg/L) improved the non-susceptibility to MEM in one (20%) of five IPM/MEM-NS Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring of susceptibility to clinically important GNB is warranted.

Multicenter surveillance of in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline, and comparator antibiotics against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex causing bloodstream infection in Taiwan, 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the in vitro activities of novel and comparator antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. METHODS: Isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 335), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 316; 144 isolates with hyperviscosity characteristics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 271), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 187), and non-typhoidal Salmonella species (n = 226), Shigella species (n = 13) from miscellaneous culture sources were collected in 2020 in Taiwan. The MICs of the isolates to test antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. GeneXpert was used to detect genes encoding carbapenemases among the carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: The MIC values of the cefepime-enmetazobactam combination against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (MIC90 ≤ 0.5 mg/L), blaKPC-harboring E. coli isolates (0.25 mg/L; n = 2), and 80% of blaOXA-48-like gene-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates (≤2 mg/L) were low. The MIC ranges of the cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates (irrespective of the carbapenemase type [MIC90 ≤ 4 mg/L]) and carbapenem-NS or ceftolozane-tazobactam-NS P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC90 value, 8 mg/L) were significantly lower than those of the cefepime-enmetazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of novel antibiotics against important drug-resistant GNB must be monitored and validated during the clinical treatment of patients.

Bacteriophages and phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas system as antibacterial therapy.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections in humans are increasing worldwide. The global spread of antimicrobial resistance poses a considerable threat to human health. Phage therapy is a promising approach to combat MDR bacteria. An increasing number of reports have been published on phage therapy and the successful application of antibacterials derived using this method. Additionally, the CRISPR-Cas system has been used to develop antimicrobials with bactericidal effects in vivo. The CRISPR-Cas system can be delivered into target bacteria in various ways, with phage-based vectors being reported as an effective method. In this review, we briefly summarise the results of randomised control trials on bacteriophage therapy. Moreover, we integrated mechanisms of the CRISPR-Cas system antimicrobials in a schematic diagram and consolidated the research on phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas system antimicrobials.

Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance mechanisms among Enterobacterales species and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria from different infection sources in Taiwan from 2016 to 2018.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. METHODS: From 2016 through 2018, a total of 5458 GNB isolates, including Escherichia coli (n = 1545), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1255), Enterobacter species (n = 259), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1127), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 368), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 179), were collected. The susceptibility results were summarized by the breakpoints of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CLSI 2020, EUCAST 2020 (for colistin), or published articles (for ceftolozane/tazobactam). The resistance genes among multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-GNB were investigated by multiplex PCR. RESULTS: Significantly higher rates of non-susceptibility (NS) to ertapenem and carbapenemase production, predominantly KPC and OXA-48-like beta-lactamase, were observed in Enterobacterales isolates causing respiratory tract infection than those causing complicated urinary tract or intra-abdominal infection (12.7%/3.44% vs. 5.7%/0.76% or 7.7%/0.97%, respectively). Isolates of Enterobacter species showed higher rates of phenotypic extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and NS to ertapenem than E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolates. Although moderate activity (54-83%) was observed against most potential AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited poor in vitro (44.7-47.4%) activity against phenotypic AmpC Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Additionally, 251 (22.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates exhibited the carbapenem-NS phenotype, and their MDR and XDR rate was 63.3% and 33.5%, respectively. Fifteen (75%) of twenty Burkholderia cenocepacia complex isolates were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam at MICs of ≤4 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: With the increase in antibiotic resistance in Taiwan, it is imperative to periodically monitor the susceptibility profiles of clinically important GNB.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Global and Narrative Review.

The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has become a major public health concern. Moreover, its colonization among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is associated with subsequent infections and mortality. To further explore the various aspects concerning CRE in LTCFs, we conducted a literature review on CRE colonization and/or infections in long-term care facilities. The prevalence and incidence of CRE acquisition among residents of LTCFs, especially in California, central Italy, Spain, Japan, and Taiwan, were determined. There was a significant predominance of CRE in LTCFs, especially in high-acuity LTCFs with mechanical ventilation, and thus may serve as outbreak centers. The prevalence rate of CRE in LTCFs was significantly higher than that in acute care settings and the community, which indicated that LTCFs are a vital reservoir for CRE. The detailed species and genomic analyses of CRE among LTCFs reported that Klebsiella pneumoniae is the primary species in the LTCFs in the United States, Spain, and Taiwan. KPC-2-containing K. pneumoniae strains with sequence type 258 is the most common sequence type of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae in the LTCFs in the United States. IMP-11- and IMP-6-producing CRE were commonly reported among LTCFs in Japan. OXA-48 was the predominant carbapenemase among LTCFs in Spain. Multiple risk factors associated with the increased risk for CRE acquisition in LTCFs were found, such as comorbidities, immunosuppressive status, dependent functional status, usage of gastrointestinal devices or indwelling catheters, mechanical ventilation, prior antibiotic exposures, and previous culture reports. A high CRE acquisition rate and prolonged CRE carriage duration after colonization were found among residents in LTCFs. Moreover, the patients from LTCFs who were colonized or infected with CRE had poor clinical outcomes, with a mortality rate of up to 75% in infected patients. Infection prevention and control measures to reduce CRE in LTCFs is important, and could possibly be controlled via active surveillance, contact precautions, cohort staffing, daily chlorhexidine bathing, healthcare-worker education, and hand-hygiene adherence.

In vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against clinically important Gram-positive cocci, Haemophilus species and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Ceftaroline, with a unique activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was not launched in Taiwan before 2019. The in vitro susceptibility data of ceftaroline against important Taiwanese pathogens are lacking. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against important pathogens collected from 2012 through 2018 were extracted from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftaroline against all isolates. RESULTS: During the study period, the in vitro data regarding isolates of S. aureus (n = 2049), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 185), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 334), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 170), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 75), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 10) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 680) regardless of hospital sites of collection were analyzed. Among the S. aureus isolates studied, 19.4% showed MICs of 1 mg/L to ceftaroline, and 4.4% showed in vitro susceptible-dose dependent to ceftaroline (all MICs, 2 mg/L). Most of other Gram-positive cocci, all H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. By contrast, about one-third (35.9%) of K. pneumoniae isolates, irrespective of infection sources, exhibited non-susceptibility to ceftaroline (MIC range, 0.015-256 mg/L; MIC50 and MIC90 values, 0.12 and 256 mg/L, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: From the pharmacodynamic perspectives, the ceftaroline dosage of 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is effective against all S. aureus and other Gram-positive isolates regardless of acquisition sites in Taiwan. Before ceftaroline is prescribed in treatment of the patient with Gram-negative infection, a cautious evaluation about patient's healthcare-associated factor is warranted.

Tentative clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values of nemonoxacin for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution, epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values and clinical breakpoints (CBPs) of nemonoxacin, a non-fluorinated quinolone, for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)-related Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: We pooled the susceptibility and clinical data of CAP patients enrolled in five clinical trials conducted in three countries from 2006 to 2017. Published pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of oral (500 mg) and intravenous (IV) (500, 650 and 750 mg) nemonoxacin formulations and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of the two aforementioned CAP-related Gram-positive cocci (GPC) were used to determine plausible CBPs. Moreover, nemonoxacin MIC distributions of CAP-relatedS. pneumoniae (n = 1800) and S. aureus (n = 2000) isolates were obtained to evaluate ECOFF values using a visual estimation approach and ECOFFinder. RESULTS: More than 92% of patients with CAP caused byS. pneumoniae or S. aureus with nemonoxacin MICs ≤ 0.25 mg/L presented positive clinical and microbiological outcomes. The ECOFF, MIC90 and MIC99 values of nemonoxacin were, respectively, 0.06, 0.125 and 1 mg/L for S. pneumoniae and 0.125, 1 and 8 mg/L for S. aureus. Based on differences in the PK profiles of oral and IV formulations, PD parameters of nemonoxacin for these CAP-GPC and clinical in vivo efficacy data, tentative CBPs of 0.5, 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively, were established for the 500 mg oral and 500 mg and 750 mg IV nemonoxacin formulations for S. pneumoniae, and 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/L for S. aureus. CONCLUSION: This study provides plausible nemonoxacin CBPs for two important CAP-GPC.

Differential time-lag effects of ambient PM2.5 and PM2.5-bound PAHs on asthma emergency department visits.

Epidemiological studies have suggested the effects of ambient fine particles (PM2.5) on asthma, but the effects of specific components of PM2.5 on asthma remain to be explored. Here, we studied the effect of PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on asthma acute exacerbation. The data on daily counts of emergency room visits (ERVs) were obtained from Wan Fang Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, from 2012 to 2015. The daily concentrations of PM2.5 and pollutant gases were obtained from a local air quality monitoring station. The levels of PM2.5-bound PAH were estimated by an established grid-scale model. Relative risks for ERVs as the increase in the level of ambient pollutants were calculated by using a generalized additive model of Poisson regression. In the present study, we observed statistically significant positive associations between PM2.5 and asthma ERVs for all age groups. PM2.5-bound PAH was also associated with asthma ERVs for all age groups. In the adult subgroup analysis, there was a significant association between PM2.5-bound PAH and asthma ERVs at lags 1 and 2 (RR 1.289, 95% CI 1.050-1.582 and RR 1.242, 95% CI 1.039-1.485). The impacts of air pollution on the risk of pediatric asthma ERV were found to be significant for PM2.5 at lag day 0 (RR 1.310, 95% CI 1.069-1.606). Moreover, pediatric asthma ERVs were significantly associated with the levels of PM2.5-bound PAH at lag 1 and 2 days (RR 1.576, 95% CI 1.371-1.810 and RR 1.426, 95% CI 1.265-1.607). The study provides evidence that PM2.5-bound PAHs were associated with an increased risk of asthma attacks. Our data further suggested that traffic exhaust is a primary source of PM2.5-bound PAHs.

Old and re-purposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has developed since December 2019. It has caused a global pandemic with more than three hundred thousand case fatalities. However, apart from supportive care by respirators, no standard medical therapy is validated. Areas covered: This paper presents old drugs with potential in vitro efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. The in vitro database, adverse effects, and potential toxicities of these drugs are reviewed regarding their feasibility of clinical prescription for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. To obtain convincing recommendations, we referred to opinions from the US National Institute of Health regarding drugs repurposed for COVID-19 therapy. Expert opinion: Although strong evidence of well-designed randomized controlled studies regarding COVID-19 therapy is presently lacking, remdesivir, teicoplanin, hydroxychloroquine (not in combination with azithromycin), and ivermectin might be effective antiviral drugs and are deemed promising candidates for controlling SARS-CoV-2. In addition, tocilizumab might be considered as the supplementary treatment for COVID-19 patients with cytokine release syndrome. In future, clinical trials regarding a combination of potentially effective drugs against SARS-CoV-2 need to be conducted to establish the optimal regimen for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline in Taiwan: Results from Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018 and Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2018-2019.

Data on ceftaroline (CPT) susceptibility amongst clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, n=1284) and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing (non-ESBL-P) Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=466), obtained from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme from 2012 to 2018, and selected MRSA isolates from patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) (n=95) from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) programme from 2018 to 2019 were analysed. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ATLAS isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method, whereas the MICs of SMART BSI-MRSA isolates were determined using the Etest and MicroScan system. The pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacodynamic parameters of CPT were applied to explore the optimal dosage against infections caused by Taiwanese MRSA and K. pneumoniae isolates. Approximately 7.1% of ATLAS MRSA isolates were susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD) to CPT, and 19.7% of the non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae isolates were not susceptible to CPT. Amongst the ATLAS MRSA isolates, the S-DD rates to CPT amongst isolates causing lower respiratory tract infections were 11.9% and 8.5% for isolates from intensive care units (ICUs) and general wards (GWs), and those causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were 20% and 5.3% for isolates from ICUs and GWs, respectively (P=0.015). Of the SSTI MRSA isolates from GWs, 22.7% displayed vancomycin MICs >1 mg/L. Amongst 95 SMART BSI MRSA isolates, 28 (46.7%) isolates exhibited lower CPT MICs by the Etest compared with 60 isolates with CPT MICs of 1-2 mg/L by the MicroScan system. CPT 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is suggested for treatment of infections caused by MRSA and phenotypic non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae in Taiwan.

Extra-respiratory manifestations of COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global health threat. Although most patients with COVID-19 manifest fever and respiratory tract symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 infection may also involve other organs/systems and present with extra-respiratory manifestations, including cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, olfactory, gustatory, ocular, cutaneous and haematological symptoms. Occasionally, these extra-respiratory symptoms/signs represent the initial presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, prior to fever or respiratory manifestations. Therefore, this comprehensive review of the extra-respiratory manifestations of COVID-19 is intended to help clinicians better understand the range of clinical presentations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowing the consideration of COVID-19 in differential diagnoses. A screening test for SARS-CoV-2 should be performed when patients have these extra-respiratory manifestations. In addition, clinicians should be alerted to the adverse effects of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents that can mimic the extra-respiratory manifestations of COVID-19. Moreover, some extra-respiratory manifestations, such as ocular and gastrointestinal involvement, may be caused by direct invasion of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, protective measures should be taken while managing the associated clinical specimens. Finally, several extra-respiratory manifestations, such as cardiac involvement, acute kidney injury, coagulation disorders and thrombotic complications, could be associated with a poor prognosis.

Lemierre's syndrome: A forgotten and re-emerging infection.

Lemierre's syndrome, also known as post-anginal septicemia or necrobacillosis, is characterized by bacteremia, internal jugular vein thrombophlebitis, and metastatic septic emboli secondary to acute pharyngeal infections. Modern physicians have "forgotten" this disease. The most common causative agent of Lemierre's syndrome is Fusobacterium necrophorum, followed by Fusobacterium nucleatum and anaerobic bacteria such as streptococci, staphylococci, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The causative focus mostly originated from pharyngitis or tonsillitis, accounting for over 85% of the cases of Lemierre's syndrome. Pneumonia or pleural empyema is the most common metastatic infection in Lemierre's syndrome. Antimicrobial therapy should be prescribed for 3-6 weeks. The treatment regimens include metronidazole and ß-lactam antibiotics. In recent years, the antibiotic stewardship program has resulted in decreased antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections. The incidence of Lemierre's syndrome has increased over the past decade. F. necrophorum is an underestimated cause of acute pharyngitis or tonsillitis. A high index of suspicion is required for the differential diagnosis of acute tonsillopharyngitis with persistent neck pain and septic syndrome.

Treatment options for COVID-19: The reality and challenges.

An outbreak related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. An extremely high potential for dissemination resulted in the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020. Despite the worsening trends of COVID-19, no drugs are validated to have significant efficacy in clinical treatment of COVID-19 patients in large-scale studies. Remdesivir is considered the most promising antiviral agent; it works by inhibiting the activity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). A large-scale study investigating the clinical efficacy of remdesivir (200 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg once daily) is on-going. The other excellent anti-influenza RdRp inhibitor favipiravir is also being clinically evaluated for its efficacy in COVID-19 patients. The protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) alone is not shown to provide better antiviral efficacy than standard care. However, the regimen of LPV/RTV plus ribavirin was shown to be effective against SARS-CoV in vitro. Another promising alternative is hydroxychloroquine (200 mg thrice daily) plus azithromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily on day 2-5), which showed excellent clinical efficacy on Chinese COVID-19 patients and anti-SARS-CoV-2 potency in vitro. The roles of teicoplanin (which inhibits the viral genome exposure in cytoplasm) and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 are under investigation. Avoiding the prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II type I receptor blockers is advised for COVID-19 patients.